Research Projects

Five projects demonstrating the complete policy intelligence pipeline: from satellite measurement, through causal inference, to policy transfer and Bayesian decision-making.

πŸ›°οΈ MEASURE

Computer Vision & Remote Sensing

Feature extraction from satellite data (Sentinel-2, SMAP, BRIGHT) using computer vision and deep learning. Foundation models create learned representations for ecological similarity and land-use classification.

πŸ”§ Tools: TensorFlow, PyTorch, Vision Transformers
πŸ” INFER

Satellite-based Synthetic Control: Prescribed Burn Evaluation

Embedding-informed donor selection improves causal inference for environmental policy. Shows that embedding-matched controls reduce pre-treatment error 49% (0.45β†’0.23) and reveal 4.4% wildfire mitigation effect (95% CI: [βˆ’5.1%, βˆ’3.7%]).

πŸ“Š Data: MODIS FIRMS, 3,966 treated pixels, 2003-2018 πŸ”¬ Method: Synthetic Control with Embeddings (PrithVi V2)
πŸ—ΊοΈ TRANSFER

Spatial Policy Transportability: AWD in Japan

Vietnam's Alternate Wet Drying (AWD) water-saving policy evaluated for transfer to Japan. Water balance modeling + biophysical constraints reveal AWD feasible in 18% of Japan (vs. 45% Vietnam), concentrated in Kanto/Tohoku. Spatial fragmentation raises extension costs 3.8Γ—.

🌾 Focus: Agricultural policy, spatial heterogeneity, institutional feasibility πŸ“ Geographies: Vietnam Mekong Delta β†’ Japan paddy systems
πŸ“Š MODEL

Trade Policy Incidence: Vietnam–China HRC Tariffs

Vietnam's 23–28% anti-dumping tariffs on Chinese Hot-Rolled Coil steel. Firm-level analysis reveals policy incidence is inverted: domestic mills profit (duopoly control) while downstream factories lose (24% cost increase). 35% tariff exemptions create institutional capture; macro outcome: stagflation risk.

πŸ’Ό Data: 105 months firm-level trade, supply-chain effects βš™οΈ Method: Policy incidence, AD-AS modeling, stakeholder analysis
βš–οΈ DECIDE

Bayesian Model Comparison: Argentina Fiscal Policy

Which model best predicts Argentina's government wage spending response to tax revenue? Bayesian comparison across 6 models. Student-T cubic wins decisively (ELPD 289 vs. Normal Linear 125)β€”200 million times more likely. Heavy tails capture outliers; cubic captures non-linear thresholds.

πŸ“ˆ Data: 105 months government finance, 10 revenue streams (2016-2024) πŸ”¬ Method: PyMC Bayesian inference, PSIS-LOO model validation